Skip to main content
[email protected]WhatsApp : +91 91063 65667Open Access Journal|Peer-Reviewed|Multidisciplinary|Research for a Better Tomorrow.ISSN 2984-8911ESTD 2023
JMVRA logoJMVRA – ISSN 2984-8911Journal of Modern and Versatile Research ApproachPeer ReviewedESTD 2023Open AccessCrossref DOI Submit Paper

JMVRA Home Policies

JMVRA Policies: Review, AI, Ethics & Retractions

Page updated

JMVRA policies together: peer review, publication ethics, AI use, similarity below 15%, retractions, data, copyright, open access, refunds, privacy.

ISSN2984-8911 Established2023 FrequencyMonthly AccessOpen Access ReviewDouble-Blind

Policy Overview

The policies here set out how JMVRA receives, reviews, publishes and corrects work, and what authors, reviewers and readers can expect from the journal. Every manuscript submitted to the journal, ISSN 2984-8911, falls under them.

If a policy on this page seems to contradict a statement elsewhere on the site, ask the editorial office to settle the matter so this page can be corrected. Policies are reviewed from time to time, and substantive changes cover manuscripts submitted afterwards, not work already accepted. Quote the exact wording when you raise an inconsistency.

  • Below 15%Similarity, checked before review
  • Blind on both sidesPeer review, kept transparent
  • CC BY 4.0Open access; authors keep copyright
  • ₹971 INR / $41 USDNothing before acceptance
  • Up to 5Authors covered by one fee
  • Never deletedRetracted articles stay, marked
JMVRA policy framework: peer review, research integrity, authorship and conflicts, corrections and retraction, open access and licence, and fees, refunds and privacy.
JMVRA's policies fall into six groups; select the image to see it full size.

Policy Library

All rules touching authors, reviewers or readers are published in full. Each card below leads to the complete policy page, and the sections lower down summarise those authors ask about most often.

See all 36 policies in one place

Peer Review Policy

Peer review covers all research content. The journal uses double-blind review, hiding author identities from reviewers and reviewer identities from authors.

The process

  1. Editorial screening — before review, the paper is checked for scope, completeness, declarations and similarity.
  2. Reviewer assignment — subject experts with no conflict regarding the work receive the manuscript.
  3. Assessment — reviewers judge originality, methodology, evidence, clarity, ethical compliance and contribution.
  4. Recommendation — the options are acceptance, minor revision, major revision or rejection.
  5. Decision — the editor considers the reports and makes the call, since reviewers only advise.
  6. Notification — the corresponding author receives the decision along with the reviewer comments.

Reviewer obligations

  • Take on only assignments that suit your expertise and your available time.
  • Keep the manuscript confidential, and neither share, cite nor use it before it is published.
  • Disclose any conflict of interest and step down if one exists.
  • Offer specific, constructive comments based on the manuscript, not on who you assume the author is.
  • Take integrity concerns to the handling editor instead of making public accusations.
This is for all acceptance and publication time. Specialist reviewers assess your paper, and you receive the acceptance or rejection decision by email and WhatsApp. Review duration depends on editorial assessment and reviewer availability; the journal does not promise acceptance or a fixed publication date.

Open-Process Peer Review

JMVRA is a Transparent, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access Journal (Refereed Journal). Reviewing is double-blind, yet the review remains open to the author, since reviewer comments and the documented decision go to every author as standard practice.

  1. ScreeningChecks of scope and declarations, plus Turnitin / iThenticate screening
  2. 2–3 reviewersSubject experts working independently, double-blind
  3. Reports to authorFull comments and recommendation are passed on
  4. Editor decisionAcceptance, revision or rejection, with the reasons given
  5. TPR reportTransparent Peer Review report available when requested

How transparent peer review works at JMVRA · Transparent peer review explained · JMVRA Peer Review: Transparent & Double-Blind

Publication Ethics

Accounts of research have to describe the work done accurately. Authors are expected by the journal to cite sources, acknowledge contributions, disclose conflicts, and secure any ethical approval and consent that is needed. Retaining your approval documents makes later queries easy to answer.

Author responsibilities

  • Send in original work that is neither published nor under review elsewhere.
  • Present data honestly, since fabrication, falsification and selective reporting count as misconduct.
  • Cite earlier work faithfully, even where it contradicts your findings.
  • For research with human participants or animals, secure ethical approval and informed consent, and note both in the manuscript.
  • Assist with any inquiry the journal runs into a concern about published work.

Editorial responsibilities

  • Base decisions on the merits of the work, ignoring the identity, institution, nationality or seniority of its authors.
  • Keep submissions confidential.
  • Do not handle manuscripts where a conflict is present.
  • Respond to credible concerns about published work and amend the record when necessary.

Misconduct

When misconduct is alleged, the journal reviews the evidence, lets the authors respond, and acts in proportion — which can mean rejection, correction, an expression of concern, retraction or informing the authors' institution. Report concerns to [email protected], giving the article title or identifier and a clear account of the evidence.

Plagiarism Policy

A similarity screen is applied to each manuscript before review. Plagiarism covers copying text, ideas, data, figures or code without attribution; close paraphrasing that retains another author's structure; and self-plagiarism, meaning an author reuses their own earlier published text without citing it.

Similarity threshold: below 15%. A submitted manuscript's overall similarity has to be below 15%, as checked ahead of review. If you are unsure how a certain overlap, such as a standard method description, will be handled, email [email protected] before submitting.
  • A submission over the threshold is sent back or rejected prior to review.
  • Rejection follows when plagiarism is found during review.
  • If plagiarism comes to light after publication, a correction or retraction results, and the authors' institution may be told.

Treat a similarity score as a prompt for judgement rather than a verdict: standard methodological phrasing may inflate a high score, and a low score does not exclude copied ideas. Editors assess both situations.

Policy on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Content

Generative AI can help with writing but cannot be an author or be used to invent results. JMVRA does not ban AI tools; it requires their use to be declared and a human to stay accountable for every sentence, number and citation.

Permitted — with disclosure

  • Polishing the grammar, spelling and readability of your own text
  • Rendering your own text in English
  • Reformatting references
  • Coding help for an analysis that you designed and validated
  • Summarising papers that you have read personally

Not acceptable

  • Naming an AI tool as author or co-author
  • Producing results, data, images or figures and passing them off as real
  • A literature review built on sources you have never read
  • AI-generated citations left unchecked
  • Rewording copied text to get past similarity screening
How to declare it — place a brief statement ahead of the reference list that names the tool and its role, for instance: “The authors used [tool name] to improve the manuscript's grammar and readability. The authors wrote, reviewed and verified all content and accept full responsibility for it.” Use that is found later to have gone undeclared is treated as research misconduct.

Full AI policy · AI-generated content policy (blog)

Authorship Policy

Authorship belongs to those who made a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the work, to acquiring or analysing the data, or to drafting and critically revising the manuscript, and who approve the submitted version and accept responsibility for it.

  • All who meet these criteria must be named, and nobody who fails to meet them should be.
  • Both gift authorship and ghost authorship amount to misconduct.
  • Acknowledgements are the place to credit other contributors.
  • Altering the author list after submission needs written consent from every author, and altering it after publication calls for a formal correction notice.

Conflict of Interest

A conflict of interest arises when a financial or personal relationship could reasonably be seen as influencing the work or its assessment — such as employment, consultancy, funding, patents, shareholdings, or a close professional or personal tie with those involved.

At submission, authors have to declare every such interest, and say plainly when there are none. Reviewers and editors must refuse or step away from work where a conflict exists. Declaring an interest accuses nobody; the failure to declare is what causes trouble.

Data, Preprints and Research Ethics

These policies cover the research behind a paper as well as the paper itself. A card gives the rule in brief, and the full policy is a single click away.

Corrections and Retractions

ActionWhen it is usedConsequence for the article
CorrectionA mistake that touches the record without changing the conclusionsThe article remains, with a correction notice attached
Expression of concernA credible concern is still open while under investigationThe article remains, and a notice warns readers
RetractionThe findings cannot be relied on, or serious misconduct has been provenThe article stays visible, marked as retracted, with reasons given

No published article is ever deleted or edited without notice. The version of record and any notice linked to it stay available, since the integrity of the scholarly record relies on readers being able to see what happened.

Retraction Policy

If a published paper proves unreliable, it is retracted, not removed. Its PDF remains at the original URL with a watermark, the DOI still resolves, and a linked retraction notice is published, so every citation keeps working and every reader sees the reason.

Grounds for retraction

  • Results that are not trustworthy, caused by honest error or by data or image fabrication, falsification or manipulation
  • Plagiarism confirmed under the plagiarism policy
  • Duplicate publication that was not disclosed
  • Research conducted unethically, lacking required approval or consent
  • Peer review that has been undermined, for example by invented reviewer identities
  • Infringement of copyright or some other grave legal matter
  • A hidden conflict of interest that would have altered how a reader judged the work
  • Authorship misconduct

The Way a Retraction Is Decided

  1. Concern raisedSubmitted by a reader, reviewer, institution or the authors themselves; reports without a name are weighed too if they include evidence
  2. AssessmentEditors review the evidence and can ask outside experts for an independent view
  3. Authors contactedEvery author is told of the concern and given a fair, set window to reply
  4. DecisionThe outcome is a retraction, a correction, an Expression of Concern, or dismissal of the case
  5. Notice publishedAttached to the article, which remains online with a visible marker

Full retraction policy · Correction policy · Crossmark update policy

Open Access Policy

From the moment an article appears, it is open to all. Readers face no subscription, paywall or embargo, and are never charged.

A single article processing charge, payable once the paper is accepted, pays for publication; details are on the Publication Charges page. The editorial decision is unaffected by payment, and no money is due before acceptance.

Archiving and Preservation

Each published article is kept on the journal website under a permanent page of its own and registered with a DOI, so citations still resolve if the site is restructured. Depositing the published version in an institutional repository is encouraged too, since it gives a separate preservation copy. A second copy elsewhere is a simple safeguard for any author.

UGC Parameters Alignment

JMVRA is aligned with UGC’s Suggested Parameters for Choosing Peer-Reviewed Journals.

JMVRA is a Transparent, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access Journal (Refereed Journal). Following the discontinuation of the UGC and UGC-CARE journal listing, and in alignment with the latest UGC-CARE recommendations and guidelines, JMVRA is aligned with UGC’s Suggested Parameters for Choosing Peer-Reviewed Journals.

Against the 35 parameters suggested by UGC, the tally is: 28 met, 2 partly met, 3 not published and 2 not applicable

UGC Parameters status · All 35 UGC parameters, one by one · UGC public notice (PDF)

Policy on Impact Factor and Metrics

The impact factor of 11.25 for JMVRA is derived from Google Scholar citation data, not from Clarivate, so it is not a Clarivate Journal Impact Factor. Authors citing it should call it Google Scholar-based. The journal links each figure it reports to the service that generated it.

Numbers were read on 30 Sep 2026 and shift whenever each service refreshes. Impact factor details · How to state it correctly

Indexing & Discovery

An index or database appears in JMVRA's listings only when its record can be opened and verified. Every badge shown below leads to the record itself.

Every indexing & discovery record, with live counts · Indexing verification

Privacy Policy

Details provided at submission, including names, affiliations, email addresses, phone numbers and correspondence, are used to run peer review, publish accepted work, issue certificates and receipts, and keep the published record.

  • Names, affiliations and metadata of authors are published alongside the article and passed to the DOI registration agency and indexing services. Because this information is public by design, it cannot be taken back once the article is published.
  • Contact information given for correspondence stays unpublished, apart from the corresponding-author details displayed on the article.
  • Authors are never told who reviewed their work.
  • The journal does not sell personal data; it passes it to third parties solely when publication or a legal duty makes that necessary.
  • Notifications are sent by email and WhatsApp to the contact details supplied at submission; keep them current.

Write to [email protected] with any question about the personal data the journal keeps on you.

Refund Policy

The publication fee at JMVRA is requested only after acceptance. No payment is due when you submit, while the paper is screened, or throughout peer review.

  • Charged after acceptance only — payment of the fee (₹971 INR for Indian authors, $41 USD for foreign authors, with up to 5 authors covered) is asked for only after the paper has been accepted.
  • Not refundable after acceptance and payment — after a paper is accepted and the fee paid, the fee cannot be refunded, since the editorial, review and publication work it covers has been done already.
  • Withdrawal after payment — authors who pull an accepted manuscript after paying are not entitled to a refund.
  • Published articles — a publication cannot be reversed like a returned product, because the article is already public and indexed.

Duplicate payments, payments made by mistake, and payments for articles that the journal ends up not publishing should be reported to the editorial office with the paper ID and payment reference; each is assessed on its own facts.

Extra or excess payment. Did you pay more than was due, whether over the stated fee or by paying it twice? Write to [email protected] and include your paper ID, the transaction ID or payment reference, when and how much you paid, and a receipt or screenshot. After checking the payment against the journal’s records, the editor returns the extra or excess amount.

Terms and Conditions

  • Using the website and the submission system means you accept these policies.
  • By submitting, authors warrant that the work is original, that they own the rights needed, and that their declarations are truthful.
  • Authors answer for the correctness of what they provide, such as names, their order, affiliations and email addresses, since these become part of the permanent published record.
  • A submission can be declined by the journal if it is outside scope, violates these policies, or cannot be evaluated because no suitable reviewer is found.
  • Acceptance is not assured at any point, and paying a fee cannot buy it.
  • Please quote the paper ID in correspondence; a message lacking it takes longer to trace.

Disclaimer

Published articles express the opinions and findings of their authors. Publication means the work cleared peer review and editorial assessment, not that the journal, its editors or reviewers endorse the authors' conclusions.

The journal accepts no liability for outcomes of using its published content, and readers who apply methods or findings in practice should rely on their own professional judgement. Links to outside sites are offered as a convenience; the journal neither controls nor answers for what those sites contain.

Complaints and Appeals

An author who thinks a decision turned on a factual mistake or a misreading of the work can appeal. Contact the editorial office within a reasonable time after the decision, quote the paper ID, and explain precisely what was misread and why, backed by evidence. Keep the appeal factual and focused on the points in dispute.

  • Where possible, an editor who took no part in the original decision handles the appeal.
  • Additional independent review may be requested.
  • An appeal's outcome is final.
  • Simply disagreeing with a reviewer's opinion does not justify an appeal.

Complaints regarding editorial process, conduct or manuscript handling go to the same address; they are acknowledged and investigated.

Turning Publication Policies Into Habits in Your Own Lab

Policies are easier to follow when they are part of daily research routines. These practices help individuals and groups stay within ethical expectations well before a manuscript is written.

  • Agree on authorship at the outset. Discuss who will contribute what and in which order names will appear when the project begins. Revisit the arrangement if roles change, and record the decision.
  • Document your data carefully. Keep raw files, analysis notes and version history organised from the start. Good records make it simple to answer questions and to correct errors responsibly.
  • Disclose assistance from software openly. If writing or analysis tools helped, describe how in the place the journal requests. Remain fully responsible for accuracy, originality and the claims in the text.
  • Run your own similarity check early. Review overlap with existing sources while drafting, and rewrite or cite properly where needed. Early checking is much easier than repairing a finished manuscript.
  • Know the route for corrections. If you find a serious mistake after publication, inform the editor promptly and cooperate fully. Openness protects readers and usually protects your standing as well.

Make ethical practice routine by agreeing roles early, documenting data, disclosing tools and correcting errors without delay.

Policy FAQ

Am I allowed to use ChatGPT or other AI tools when writing my paper?

AI tools are fine for language editing, translation, reference formatting or help with code, as long as a brief statement placed before the references discloses it. An AI tool cannot be listed as an author, and must not produce results, data or citations that are unverified.

What happens when a published paper is retracted?

Nothing is deleted. The article remains at its original URL with a retracted label, its DOI continues to work, and a linked retraction notice states the reason.

May I post a preprint before submitting to JMVRA?

Yes. A preprint is not counted as prior publication at JMVRA. State it at submission, so reviewers are not caught off guard when a similarity check matches your own preprint.

Is a Data Availability Statement required?

Yes. Each paper needs one ahead of the reference list, even when the data cannot be shared, for instance “No new data were created” or “Data cannot be shared for ethical reasons”.

Does JMVRA align with UGC norms?

JMVRA is aligned with UGC’s Suggested Parameters for Choosing Peer-Reviewed Journals.

Is the impact factor of JMVRA a Clarivate JIF?

No. The 11.25 impact factor comes from Google Scholar citation data, so cite it as Google Scholar-based.

Which similarity percentage is acceptable to JMVRA?

A submitted manuscript's overall similarity has to be under 15%, and this is checked before review. Treat the score as a prompt for judgement rather than a verdict, because editors also examine the nature of the overlap. Common sources of overlap include references and standard method wording.

How should AI use be declared in my manuscript?

Insert a short disclosure just before the references, naming the tool and saying what it was used for. A sample wording is “[tool name] was used by the authors to refine the grammar and readability of this manuscript. The authors wrote, reviewed and verified all content and accept full responsibility for it.” Adapt the tool name and the task to your own case.

Is ethics approval needed for my study?

Yes, if the research involves human participants or animals. An ethics committee must approve before the research starts, since approval after the fact is not accepted, and consent has to be obtained and reported.

How can I change the list of authors after submission?

Any change to the authors after submission needs all authors to agree in writing. After publication, a formal correction notice is required.

How can I appeal against an editorial decision?

Contact the editorial office within a reasonable time of the decision, quote the paper ID, and state exactly what was misunderstood and why, with evidence. Where possible an editor uninvolved in the original decision considers the appeal, and its outcome is final. Merely disagreeing with a reviewer’s judgement is not a ground for appeal.

How can I report a concern about a published article?

Send an email to [email protected] with the article details and your supporting evidence. Concerns from readers, reviewers, institutions or the authors are looked into; anonymous reports are weighed if they include evidence, and every author gets a fair chance to reply.

Who holds the copyright to my published article?

You do. The copyright remains with the authors, who on acceptance give JMVRA the right to publish and distribute the article under an open licence allowing others to reuse it with proper credit.

May I deposit my published article in a repository?

Yes. The published version can go into an institutional repository or be shared from a personal page, which also gives you an independent preservation copy.

Can the publication fee be refunded?

The fee is requested only after acceptance. When a paper has been accepted and the fee paid, no refund is available, as the editorial, review and publication work is already complete. Duplicate, mistaken and excess payments are assessed on their facts; get in touch with the editorial office, giving your paper ID and payment reference.

Which personal data does JMVRA publish?

Authors' names, affiliations and article metadata appear with the article and go to the DOI registration agency and indexing services. Contact details stay unpublished other than the corresponding-author details on the article, and personal data is never sold.

Policy Contact

Email[email protected]
Mobile / WhatsApp+91 91063 65667
JournalJMVRA — Journal of Modern and Versatile Research Approach, ISSN 2984-8911
PublisherJMVRA Publication
IncludeThe paper ID, the article title, and a description of the concern

Summary

Policy at a glance

Peer reviewDouble-blind, with a transparent record
LicenceCC BY 4.0; authors keep copyright
AI contentUse must be disclosed; AI cannot be an author
PlagiarismSimilarity screening before review
RefundsNone once editorial work is done; errors assessed on the facts
AppealsFinal; handled by an uninvolved editor where possible

Complaints & appeals

Raising a concern or an appeal

  1. Write to the office[email protected], quoting the paper ID.
  2. State the point preciselyWhat was misread and the evidence for it.
  3. Independent handlingWhere possible an editor outside the original decision takes it up; extra review may be sought.
  4. Written outcomeThe decision on an appeal is final.
Just ₹971 INR
Publish in a UGC-aligned peer-reviewed journal · ₹971 INR Indian authors · $41 USD international · Impact Factor 11.25
Submit Paper