e-ISSN: 2984-8911

Journal of Modern and Versatile Research Approach

Review Process

All submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and scientific validity. Our review process is designed to be fair, transparent, and constructive.

Types of Peer Review

We employ double-blind peer review, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other. This ensures unbiased evaluation based solely on scientific merit.

👤 Authors Blinded

Reviewers do not know author identities

🔍 Reviewers Blinded

Authors do not know reviewer identities

⏰ Review Timeline

5-7
days

Initial Editorial Screening

Quick assessment of scope and quality

3-4
weeks

Peer Review

Expert evaluation by 2-3 reviewers

1-2
weeks

Editorial Decision

Final decision after reviews received

4-6
weeks

Revision Period

Time for authors to address reviewer comments

👨‍🔬 Reviewer Selection

Reviewers are carefully selected based on:

🎓 Expertise

Subject matter expertise and research area

📚 Publication Record

Strong publication history in relevant areas

⚖️ No Conflicts

No conflicts of interest with authors

🌍 Diversity

Geographic and institutional diversity

📋 Review Criteria

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts on the following criteria:

✨ Originality and Significance

Novel contribution to the field and potential impact

🔬 Methodology and Rigor

Sound research design and appropriate methods

📝 Clarity of Presentation

Clear writing and logical organization

✅ Validity of Conclusions

Conclusions supported by data and analysis

📖 Appropriate Citations

Proper literature review and references

📊 Editorial Decisions

Accept

Manuscript accepted as is or with minor editorial changes

🔧

Minor Revisions

Small changes required before acceptance

🔨

Major Revisions

Substantial modifications needed, re-review required

Reject

Manuscript not suitable for publication

⚖️ Appeals

Authors may appeal editorial decisions by providing a detailed justification to the Editor-in-Chief. Appeals should include:

  • Point-by-point response to reviewer concerns
  • Evidence supporting the appeal
  • Specific reasons why the decision should be reconsidered

Review Transparency: We are committed to fair and transparent peer review processes that maintain the highest standards of scholarly publishing.

Related Topics

#peer review#quality#evaluation#reviewers

Related Policies

Terms & ConditionsFeatured

Terms and Conditions

Terms and conditions governing the use of our journal management system platform.

1
2 min
Updated: Dec 12, 2025 11:42 AM
PrivacyFeatured

Privacy Policy

Our commitment to protecting your personal information and data privacy in our journal management system.

2
2 min
Updated: Dec 12, 2025 1:46 PM
Open AccessFeatured

Open Access Policy

Our commitment to making research freely accessible to the global community.

2
2 min
Updated: Dec 12, 2025 2:57 PM