logo
2984-8911
Editorial Best Practices

Common Mistakes New Journal Editors Make and How to Avoid Them

Jul 09, 2026 4:53 PM
ScholarJMS Team
16 views
5 min read

Common Mistakes New Journal Editors Make and How to Avoid Them

Launching and managing an academic journal is a significant responsibility. For new editors, especially in multidisciplinary journals, the process can be complex, involving editorial decisions, peer-review management, publishing standards, and technical infrastructure.

In 2026, the expectations from journals are higher than ever. Authors demand transparency, reviewers expect structured workflows, and indexing agencies require strict compliance with quality and ethical standards.

The Journal of Modern and Versatile Research Approach (JMVRA) reflects how structured editorial practices can support successful journal operations. This article highlights the most common mistakes new journal editors make and provides practical solutions to avoid them.


Lack of Clear Journal Scope and Identity

The Mistake

Many new editors launch journals without clearly defining:

  • Subject scope
  • Target audience
  • Publication objectives

This leads to confusion among authors and reviewers.


How to Avoid It

  • Define a clear multidisciplinary scope
  • Identify target research areas
  • Align journal objectives with academic needs

A strong identity attracts the right submissions.


Weak Editorial Board

The Mistake

A poorly structured editorial board can:

  • Reduce credibility
  • Limit peer-review quality
  • Affect indexing opportunities

How to Avoid It

  • Include experienced researchers
  • Ensure diversity across disciplines
  • Add international members
  • Display affiliations clearly

A strong board builds trust and authority.


Poor Peer-Review Management

The Mistake

Common issues include:

  • Delayed reviewer responses
  • Unqualified reviewer selection
  • Lack of structured review process

How to Avoid It

  • Use a structured peer-review system
  • Maintain a reviewer database
  • Set clear timelines
  • Monitor review quality

Efficient peer review improves publication quality.


Relying on Manual or Outdated Systems

The Mistake

Using email-based or outdated workflows results in:

  • Lost submissions
  • Delayed processing
  • Poor communication

How to Avoid It

Adopt a modern system like ScholarJMS that offers:

  • Automated manuscript submission
  • Editorial workflow management
  • Reviewer tracking

Automation improves efficiency and reliability.


Need help setting up a professional journal workflow?

We support editors with complete journal solutions:

  • ScholarJMS journal website and workflow system
  • OJS hosting, migration, and optimisation via OJSCloud
  • ISSN consulting and journal readiness
  • Crossref DOI setup via GetDOI
  • Transparent peer-review ecosystem with Scholar9

WhatsApp: +91 82003 85143
Email: inquiry@ojscloud.com


Ignoring ISSN and DOI Planning

The Mistake

Some journals delay or ignore:

  • ISSN registration
  • DOI integration

This affects credibility and indexing.


How to Avoid It

  • Apply for ISSN early
  • Integrate DOI for all articles
  • Use services like OJSCloud and GetDOI for support

Proper planning ensures smooth growth.


Inconsistent Publication Schedule

The Mistake

Irregular publication leads to:

  • Loss of author trust
  • Rejection from indexing databases

How to Avoid It

  • Define a publication frequency
  • Maintain a consistent schedule
  • Plan issues in advance

Consistency is critical.


Poor Website Quality and Transparency

The Mistake

A weak journal website may lack:

  • Editorial information
  • Author guidelines
  • Ethical policies

How to Avoid It

Ensure your website includes:

  • Aims and scope
  • Editorial board
  • Submission guidelines
  • Contact details

A professional website builds credibility.


Low-Quality Submissions and Weak Screening

The Mistake

Accepting low-quality papers can:

  • Damage journal reputation
  • Reduce citation impact

How to Avoid It

  • Implement strict initial screening
  • Define clear submission criteria
  • Maintain quality standards

Quality should always be prioritised.


Lack of Ethical Policies

The Mistake

Missing or unclear policies on:

  • Plagiarism
  • Conflict of interest
  • Retractions

can lead to serious issues.


How to Avoid It

  • Define clear ethical guidelines
  • Follow international standards
  • Use plagiarism detection tools

Ethics is essential for credibility.


Poor Communication with Authors and Reviewers

The Mistake

Delays or lack of communication can:

  • Frustrate authors
  • Reduce reviewer engagement

How to Avoid It

  • Use automated communication systems
  • Provide timely updates
  • Maintain transparency

Good communication improves relationships.


Not Planning for Indexing

The Mistake

Many editors delay indexing preparation, leading to:

  • Missed opportunities
  • Rejection from databases

How to Avoid It

  • Prepare early for indexing requirements
  • Maintain quality and consistency
  • Follow DOAJ and Scopus guidelines

Upgrade your journal management approach

If you want to avoid these common mistakes, we can help:

  • Complete journal setup with ScholarJMS
  • OJS migration and support via OJSCloud
  • ISSN consulting and readiness
  • Crossref DOI support via GetDOI
  • Editorial workflow automation
  • Transparent peer-review integration with Scholar9

WhatsApp: +91 82003 85143
Email: inquiry@ojscloud.com


Best Practices for New Journal Editors

Focus on Quality Over Quantity

  • Prioritise strong research
  • Maintain strict review standards

Build a Strong Editorial Network

  • Engage experts
  • Expand reviewer base

Use Modern Technology

  • Automate workflows
  • Improve efficiency

Stay Updated

  • Follow publishing trends
  • Adapt to new standards

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is the biggest mistake new journal editors make?

Lack of clear scope and poor editorial structure.

How can I improve peer-review quality?

By using structured systems and selecting qualified reviewers.

Is a journal management system necessary?

Yes, it improves workflow efficiency and reduces errors.

When should I apply for ISSN and DOI?

As early as possible during journal setup.

How can I prepare for indexing?

By maintaining quality, consistency, and ethical standards.


Conclusion

Managing a journal successfully requires careful planning, strong editorial practices, and modern infrastructure. By avoiding common mistakes, new editors can build journals that are credible, efficient, and impactful.

The Journal of Modern and Versatile Research Approach (JMVRA) demonstrates how structured workflows and high standards contribute to journal success. Editors who focus on quality, transparency, and efficiency will be better positioned to achieve long-term growth and recognition.

If you are starting or managing a journal, expert guidance can help you avoid mistakes and build a strong foundation.

Get in touch for complete journal support:

WhatsApp: +91 82003 85143
Email: inquiry@ojscloud.com

journal editor mistakescommon publishing mistakeseditorial workflow issuesjournal management errorspeer review problemsacademic journal best practices